Generate · Optimize
Three times the leads. Roughly half the total marketing outlay.
National employment firm
- Lead volume
- 3.0×
- Total monthly marketing outlay
- −49%
- Cost per lead
- −56%
- Organic conversion rate
- 1.27% → 2.03% (1.6×)
- Editorial referring domains per month
- 2.22 → 17.25 (7.8×)
April–June 2025 vs. April–June 2026
Comparable months YoY (peak-month reference stated below)
Comparable months YoY
12 months rolling
Monthly average, Ahrefs 44-month backlink history
Editorial = external publisher links; excludes directories, syndicated releases, owned sites, paid placements, and 538 spam-flagged domains discarded from 825 total.
From April through June 2025 to the same months in 2026, monthly marketing outlay fell and lead volume roughly tripled year over year. The late-2024 peak month for reference: $16,677 in total marketing outlay. The current monthly run rate is approximately $8,500.
What changed on one practice-area page
One practice-area page was rebuilt in October 2025. In the 12 months after the rebuild the page generated 190 leads, compared with 123 in the prior 12 months, on comparable recorded traffic. Organic conversion rate on the page moved from 1.27% to 2.03%.
That is an observation, not a controlled experiment — search demand, brand recognition, tracking coverage, and other work all move in the background. What the account records support directly: the page continued generating leads without incremental media spend during the period measured.
Verified across three separate systems
- The firm’s analytics for sessions and conversion.
- The firm’s answering service for calls that qualified as actual matters, matched back to the CRM on caller number.
- Ahrefs, an external count of referring domains rather than an on-site metric controlled inside the firm’s analytics account.
What the account records could not yet prove
Of the 73 tracked inbound calls in the review window, 18 (24.7%) were abandoned before anyone answered, at a median wait time of 46 seconds within that abandoned subset. A LinkedIn test spent $442 for 23 clicks — a $19.22 CPC against Google’s $6.84 per click in the same window. On whether the phone and form records could be combined into a single count of signed matters, the report concluded that a combined count was not yet supportable from the available records.
